Cases 41 - 50 of 157
Richards v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Melody Richards
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Walkingstick v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Richard Todd Walkingstick
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Wuenst v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Richard Wuenst
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
OSBORNE et al v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC et al
as 1:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
CARROL A. OSBORNE, DEBRA SALANT, RICHARD H WEATHERLY, JR. and others
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., JOHNSON AND JOHNSON SERVICES, INC., THOMAS P. SCHMALZRIED, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
DeRose et al v. City of Raleigh et al
as 5:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Lanette B DeRose and Richard T DeRose
Defendant:
City of Raleigh, DoorDash, Inc., Beaver Creek Land Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
BISHOP et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2022cv00170
Petitioner:
DALE EARNEST BISHOP and RICHARD EUGENE BENZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bishop et al v. United States of America
as 7:2022mc00003
Petitioner:
Dale Earnest Bishop and Richard Eugene Benz
Respondent:
United States of America
Prisner et al v. United States of America
as 7:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Tammy Prisner, EDWARD LUTHY, JR. as the Administrator for the Estate of CHARLOTTE LUTHY, Deceased,, MELODY RICHARDS and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Fancher et al v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
David Fancher, Lee Futrell, John Orue and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Fancher et al v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv00315
Plaintiff:
David Fancher, Lee Futrell, John Orue and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
