Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 90
Frederiksson v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation
as 10-4406
Plaintiff - Appellant: Marjatta Peurala, individually, and as personal representative of the Estate of Seppo Antero Peurala and Antti Olavi Peurala
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant: Ulla Christine Frederiksson, individually, and as personal representative of the Estate of Peter Jarl Frederiksson and as guardian ad litem for her minor children, Niclas Frederiksson, Sebastian Frederiksson and Nicole Frederiksson
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: HR Textron, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Textron, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee: Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation, Inc., Helicopter Support, Inc., Copterline Oy and others
Kooperi v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation
as 10-4444
Plaintiff - Appellant: Pirkko Onverva Kooperi, Individually, and as personal representative of the Estate of Onni Matti Kopperi and Marika Kopperi-Gronlund
Defendant - Appellee: Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation, Inc., Helicopter Support, Inc., HR Textron, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Textron, Inc. and others
Nelson v. Aeronautical Accessories, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv01328
Plaintiff: Karen Nelson
Defendant: Aeronautical accessories, inc. , Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. , Edwards & Associates, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boudreaux v. PHI, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00008
Plaintiff: Allen Patrick Boudreaux, Sr.
Defendant: PHI, Inc., Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation and Aeronautical Accessories, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Airline Crash
NELSON v. AERONAUTICAL ACCESSORIES, INC. et al
as 3:2009cv00512
Plaintiff: KAREN NELSON
Defendant: AERONAUTICAL ACCESSORIES, INC., BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON, INC., EDWARDS & ASSOCIATES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Type: Torts - Injury Both
Ramage et al v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv02901
Plaintiff: Diane Ramage and Ginger Ramage
Defendant: Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation, Carson Helicopters, Inc., United Technologies Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Ramage et al v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation et al
as 2:2009at01676
Plaintiff: Diane Ramage and Ginger Ramage
Defendant: Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation, Carson Helicopters, Inc., United Technologies Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Tonya Helman, et al v. Alcoa Global Fasteners, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-56501
Plaintiff - Appellant: TONYA HELMAN, individually and as Personal Representatives of and Successors-In-Interest to the Successor Estate of Cory Helman, deceased, JIM HELMAN, individually and as Personal Representatives of and Successors-In-Interest to the Successor/Estate of Cory Helman, deceased, SANDY HELMAN, individually and as Personal Representatives of and Successors-In-Interest to the Successor/Estate of Cory Helman, deceased and others
Defendant - Appellee: ALCOA GLOBAL FASTENERS, INC., a California Corporation, PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC, a Corporation, HI-SHEAR CORPORATION, a California Corporation and others
Steele v. Columbia Helicopters, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv01010
Plaintiff: Paul D. Steele, Paul D. Steele, Paul D. Steele and others
Defendant: Columbia Helicopters, Inc., Carson Helicopter Services, Inc., Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation and others
ThirdParty Defendant: United States of America
ThirdParty Plaintiff: Carson Helicopter Services, Inc., Carson Helicopters, Inc. and Carson Helicopters, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Schroeder et al v. Columbia Helicopters, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00935
Plaintiff: Richard W. Schroeder, Jr., Richard W. Schroeder, Jr., Leta Jean Schroeder and others
Defendant: Columbia Helicopters, Inc., Carson Helicopters, Inc., Carson Helicopters, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Type: Torts - Injury None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?