Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 51 - 57 of 57
WHITE et al v. ACANDS INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2009cv90807
Plaintiff: MARSHALL H. WHITE, JR. and MARY F. WHITE
Defendant: ACANDS INCORPORATED, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
WHITE et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2009cv80322
Plaintiff: CLINTON WHITE and MARY FRANCES WHITE
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, BABCOCK AND WILCOX COMPANY and others
ThirdParty Defendant: MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
WHITE v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77132
Plaintiff: MARY L. WHITE
Defendant: A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
WHITE v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77131
Plaintiff: MARY A. WHITE
Defendant: A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
White v. Deem et al
as 1:2008cv00253
Plaintiff: Mary Nell White
Defendant: Dale Aaron Deem and J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WHITE v. CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv61891
Plaintiff: MARY S. WHITE, MARY S. WHITE and MARY S. WHITE
Defendant: CELOTEX CORPORATION, KEENE BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION, KEENE BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Smith et al v. Merck & Co Inc
as 2:2006cv09769
Plaintiff: Frank L. Smith, Frank L. Smith, Theophilus Rembert and others
Defendant: Merck & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?