Cases 51 - 60 of 1,130
Neil v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11971
Plaintiff:
Kristal Neil
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ALLEN et al v 3M COMPANY
as 9:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
ZACKERIE ALLEN, NICHOLAS AMATUZZO, EDWIN AMONG and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miller v. Walker
as 1:2023cv02279
Plaintiff:
Shardea Miller
Defendant:
Robert Neil Walker
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
MARKEY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv24127
Plaintiff:
NEIL PHILIP MARKEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carter v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2023pq02976
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Farren Neil Carter
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Allen et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02634
Plaintiff:
Zackerie Allen, Nicholas Amatuzzo, Edwin Among and others
Defendant:
3M Company
v. PENAFLORIDA et al
as 3:2023cv23254
Defendant:
NEIL PENAFLORIDA, 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Maltais v. Bullseye Bow, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
ANDREW MALTAIS, JR.
Defendant:
BULLSEYE BOW, LLC and NEIL KAHRS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SHELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv22770
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER NEIL SHELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Wiswell et al
as 2:2023cv00278
Not Classified By Court:
T. Neil Bemenderfer
Plaintiff:
Ryan Williams
Defendant:
Thomas Wiswell and Otto Transfer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
