Cases 51 - 60 of 136
DAVIS v. RESTAURANT DEPOT, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv05568
Plaintiff:
MANKAPO R. DAVIS
Defendant:
RESTAURANT DEPOT, LLC , RD UNITED, LLC , RESTAURANT DEPOT ENTERPRISES, LLC and others
Cross_claimant:
RESTAURANT DEPOT, INC. , RESTAURANT DEPOT, LLC , RD UNITED, LLC and others
Cross_defendant:
SAM'S CLUB, INC. , SAM'S EAST, INC. and WALMART STORES EAST, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Neswood v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 1:2016cv01153
Plaintiff:
Irene Neswood
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc. , Sam's Club Corporation and Wal-Mart Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matthews et al v. Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01142
Defendant:
Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC and Sam's East, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Matthews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Paterakis v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 8:2016cv02730
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Paterakis
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc.
Mediator:
Victor D. Berg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garrison et al v. Sam's East, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00152
Plaintiff:
Tammy A. Garrison
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Xerox Recovery Services
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Montemayor v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 4:2016cv02729
Plaintiff:
Minerva Montemayor
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MANKO v. SAM'S EAST, INC.
as 2:2016cv01342
Plaintiff:
JEANNE MANKO
Defendant:
SAM'S EAST, INC.
Mediator:
HARRY M. PARAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Madaras v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 8:2016cv02355
Plaintiff:
Anna Maria Madaras
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dranoff v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 7:2016cv06482
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Dranoff
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zamora v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 4:2016cv02438
Plaintiff:
Blanca Zamora
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
