Cases 71 - 80 of 14,893
CABELL v. MERCK & CO. et al
as 2:2020cv01740
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., MERCK & CO. INC and MCKESSON CORP
Plaintiff:
EUNICE H. CABELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DELIONS et al v. CARNEGIE INSTITUTE et al
as 2:2020cv00487
Plaintiff:
MALISA A. DELIONS, JOHN T. MCCAFFREY, MICHEALA F. CASTILLO and others
Defendant:
CARNEGIE INSTITUTE, OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, WESTINGHOUSE LICENSING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MILLER v. Catbas et al
as 2:2020cv01715
Plaintiff:
LESLIE A. MILLER
Defendant:
Fikret N Catbas and Kemel H Catbas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Avila et al v. Thomas et al
as 1:2020cv00411
Defendant:
Levco Property Management, LLC., William H. Thomas, Jr., Donna P. Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Avila and Jasmine Santana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
NAZARIO v. SUNSTATE LOGISTICS, INC. et al
as 5:2020cv01246
Defendant:
HEIDI WITMER, JAMES H. COFIELD, SUNSTATE LOGISTICS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS NAZARIO, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WITMER et al v. NAZARIO et al
as 5:2020cv01247
Defendant:
JAMES H. COFIELD, NICHOLAS NAZARIO, JR., ABC CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
CHANDLER POPE and HEIDI WITMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SURMAN et al v. PAYNE
as 3:2019cv00216
Plaintiff:
NICHOLINA SURMAN and STEPHEN SURMAN, H/W
Defendant:
ROBERT PAYNE and DOT TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SURMAN et al v. PAYNE
as 2:2019cv04695
Plaintiff:
NICHOLINA SURMAN and STEPHEN SURMAN, H/W
Defendant:
ROBERT PAYNE and DOT TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FORRY et al v. LSC COMMUNICATIONS US, LLC
as 5:2019cv04541
Plaintiff:
KEVIN H FORRY and DEBBIE A FORRY
Defendant:
LSC COMMUNICATIONS US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
CARTER v. FITNESS INTERNATIONAL, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv01215
Defendant:
FITNESS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, LA FITNESS and JOHN DOE
Plaintiff:
CHARLES H CARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
