Cases 71 - 80 of 720
ROSARIO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22899
Plaintiff:
FELIX ROSARIO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rosario v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 5:2022cv06086
Plaintiff:
Mercedes Rosario
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
ROSARIO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19294
Plaintiff:
FELIPE ROSARIO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Armenta v. Covidien, Inc.
as 1:2022cv11605
Plaintiff:
Rosario Armenta
Defendant:
Covidien, Inc., Covidien Ltd., Covidien Plc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROSARIO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18573
Plaintiff:
MILAGROS ROSARIO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chuni et al v. PJM Trucking, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01464
Plaintiff:
Jose Miranda Chuni and Elena Del Rosario Miranda
Defendant:
PJM Trucking, LLC, Evans Delivery Company, Inc. t/d/b/a Evans Delivery Company, Interpool, Inc. t/d/b/a Trac Intermodal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ROSARIO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18282
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN JOSE ROSARIO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROSARIO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17741
Plaintiff:
GUILLERMO ROSARIO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROSARIO BONILLA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17380
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO ROSARIO BONILLA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rosario v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 8:2022cv01976
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ROSARIO
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. A foreign profit corporation doing business as The Home Depot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
