Cases 81 - 90 of 279
Khan v. Woods et al
as 1:2021cv00493
Plaintiff:
Jamil Khan
Defendant:
Michael L. Woods and Escot Bus Lines, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 au
KHAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv09871
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ABBAS KHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Courtney v. Khan et al
as 1:2021cv00710
Plaintiff:
Margaret Courtney
Defendant:
EAN Holdings LLC, Nadia Lorraine Khan, ELRAC LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 tm
Allen et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2020cv02380
Plaintiff:
Shaunda Robb, Michael Berg, Lynda Delaney and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KHAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv19057
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL
Plaintiff:
NAOMI KHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KHAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv16103
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY KHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moeljona v. The Boeing Company
as 1:2020cv05773
Plaintiff:
Khan Moeljona and Khan Moeljono
Defendant:
The Boeing Company, Goodrich Corporation, Department of Transportation, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KHAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv01852
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
HASSAN RIZWAN KHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Khan v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04886
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Azaam Khan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KHAN v. WALMART INC. et al
as 2:2020cv10556
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMED ALEEM KHAN
Defendant:
WALMART INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
