Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Barnes et al v. Proliance Surgeons Inc P S
as 2:2023cv01860
Plaintiff:
Traci M Barnes and Katina M Raddigan
Defendant:
Proliance Surgeons Inc P S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Derrick v. Core-Mark International Inc et al
as 3:2022cv05629
Plaintiff:
Tracie M. Derrick and Tracie M Derrick
Defendant:
Core-Mark International Inc, Jeffery D Cooke, Jeffery Dean Cooke and others
Interested Party:
Department of Labor and Industries
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Maynor et al v. Sea Mar Community Health Center
as 2:2022cv00187
Plaintiff:
Daniel Maynor, Jr., Tracy Fox and Daniel Maynor, Jr
Defendant:
Sea Mar Community Health Center
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Dye et al v. Kempley
as 3:2020cv05582
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Dye and Tracy A. Dye
Defendant:
Robert Henry Kempley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richardson v. US Department of Labor et al
as 2:2020cv00923
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Dept of Labor, Sandra E Tyus and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick W Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garrow v. Safeway Inc
as 2:2019cv01578
Plaintiff:
Tracy Garrow
Defendant:
Safeway Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Benzel et al v. Monsanto Company
as 2:2019cv00174
Plaintiff:
Tracy Ann Benzel and Thomas Jay Benzel
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clampitt v. Smith
as 1:2019cv03055
Respondent:
Scott Smith
Petitioner:
Traci Lee Clampitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Moore v. United States
as 3:2018cv05294
Plaintiff:
Tracie Denise Moore
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Mesecher et al v. Lowes Companies Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00299
Plaintiff:
Tracy E Mesecher , Charice A Mesecher and Mikayala M Reynolds
Defendant:
Lowes Companies Inc , Monsanto Company and HD Hudson Manufacturing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
