Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Larson et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv06643
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Larson and Joseph M. Larson
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Larson v. Costa Del Mar
as 1:2018cv01483
Plaintiff:
Daniel K. Larson
Defendant:
Costa Del Mar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carlo et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11144
Plaintiff:
Joseph Quinones, Dennis Dawid, Gary Luciani and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Larson v. Pan Am Railways, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00855
Defendant:
Pan Am Railways, Inc. and Pan Am Railways, Inc. doing business as Springfield Terminal Railway Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Matthew W. Larson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
Larson v. Buckingham Properties, LLC
as 6:2017cv06275
Plaintiff:
Paul Larson
Defendant:
Buckingham Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitaker et al v. Bristol Myers-Squibb et al
as 1:2017cv02046
Plaintiff:
Gary Whitaker , Roy Griffin , Regina G. Griffin and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Larson v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 7:2014cv07648
Plaintiff:
Brianna Stephanie Larson
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG and Bayer Oy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Larson v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 1:2013cv01608
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Judith Larson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Larson v. Merck & Co., Inc et al
as 1:2012cv05476
Plaintiff:
Kurt Larson
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Larson v. Merck & Co, Inc.
as 1:2010cv05485
Plaintiff:
Curtis Larson
Defendant:
Merck & Co, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
