Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Washington et al v. Nichols et al
as 2:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Desiree Washington and Kenneth Kirk
Defendant:
CR England Inc, Michael Nichols, CR England Inc doing business as Premier Truck Driving School and others
Not Classified By Court:
Galen Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
BUTLER v. CR BARD INC et al
as 3:2020cv00211
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, CR BARD INC, DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZAMBRANO v. SERGE MARQUIS
as 1:2020cv02309
Defendant:
SERGE MARQUIS, Amehadari Desta, CRS Express Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Zambrano Mario and MARIO ZAMBRANO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sharpe v. CR Bard Inc et al
as 1:2020cv00099
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 10, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated, CR Bard Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Sharpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bradburn v. CR Bard Inc et al
as 3:2019cv00925
Defendant:
DOES 1- 10, inclusive, Bard Access Systems Inc and CR Bard Inc
Plaintiff:
Robert Bradburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GONZALEZ-HERNANDEZ, et al v. MARQUIS, et al
as 2:2019cv00490
Defendant:
T. AMEHADARI DESTA, CRS EXPRESS, INC.,, MAROL EXPRESS, INC., and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE LUIS ISIDRO GONZALEZ-HERNANDEZ, and ROBERTO MANUEL SOROA,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Haley et al
as 3:2017cv00701
Plaintiff:
Rodney J Taylor
Defendant:
Karen L Haley and CR England, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Bard Inc et al
as 1:2013cv00328
Plaintiff:
Jessie Jones
Defendant:
CR Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matchette et al v. CR Bard Inc
as 1:2012cv00287
Plaintiff:
Molly Dale Matchette and Kevin Dale Matchette
Defendant:
CR Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAYWOOD v. ANONYMOUS HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2011cv01313
Defendant:
ANONYMOUS HOSPITAL and CR BARD, INC.
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA CAYWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
