Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Sanchez-Caballero v. Michael et al
as 3:2023cv02282
Plaintiff:
Carlo Sanchez-Caballero
Defendant:
John Henry Michael, Customs & Border Protection (CPB), Department of Homeland Security (DPS) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 t Tort Claim
SANCHEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13422
Plaintiff:
CARLOS SANCHEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KLAPP v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13162
Plaintiff:
ADAM KLAPP, CHARLES KINNARD, DARRIUS PEARSON and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SANCHEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11073
Plaintiff:
CARLOS SANCHEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Klapp et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01485
Plaintiff:
Adam Klapp, Charles Kinnard, Darrius Pearson and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Lopez et al v. University of the Southwest
as 2:2023cv00327
Plaintiff:
Todd Lopez, Juan Carlos Sanchez Vargas and Maria Del Rocio Lopez Brita
Defendant:
University of the Southwest
Intervenor:
Dennis Murphy, Abby Rains and Eric Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Sanchez Calderon v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv01344
Plaintiff:
Carlos Sanchez Calderon
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SANCHEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00944
Plaintiff:
KRISTOPHER CARLOS SANCHEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SANCHEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv43474
Plaintiff:
CARLOS SANCHEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rosario v. Sanchez
as 1:2021cv02538
Defendant:
carlos sanchez
Plaintiff:
Diokis Rosario
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
