Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Dehon v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
Crystal Dehon
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Dehon v. United States of America
as 3:2021cv00456
Plaintiff:
Crystal Dehon
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILLIAMS v. MEYJES et al
as 5:2019cv00035
Defendant:
MAX DEHON, WILLIAM MCCARTHY, SCOTT MCAVOY and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER AND DIANE WILLIAMS, DIANE WILLIAMS and CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Essie Lemieux, et al v. CSR Limited
as 17-30346
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ESSIE LEMIEUX, widow of Raymond J. Lemieux, Sr., RAYMOND J. LEMIEUX, JR., surviving child of Raymond J. Lemieux, Sr. and DEHON LEMIEUX CALLIER, surviving child of Raymond J. Lemieux, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION
Caillier v. The TJX Companies, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00112
Plaintiff:
Dehon Caillier
Defendant:
The TJX Companies, Inc. , Ridgewood Jackson MS, LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lemieux, et al v. CSR Ltd, et al
as 2:2016cv16508
Plaintiff:
Essie Lemieux , Raymond J. Lemieux, Jr. and Dehon Lemieux Callier
Defendant:
CSR Ltd and American Optical Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEHON v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv57406
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND H. DEHON
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DEHON v. INLAND TUG CO.
as 5:2011cv54022
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND H. DEHON
Defendant:
INLAND TUG CO.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DEHON v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv54423
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND H. DEHON
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DEHON v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv54703
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND H DEHON
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
