Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Fink v. Third Coast Insurance Company et al
as 2:2023cv05936
Plaintiff:
David Fink
Defendant:
Third Coast Insurance Company, Rafael Dorzon, VS Carriers, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
FINK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13688
Plaintiff:
DAVID FINK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FINK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15441
Plaintiff:
NATHAN DAVID FINK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FINK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv24063
Plaintiff:
DAVID FINK
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FINK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv18053
Plaintiff:
NATHAN DAVID FINK
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matute Cabanag v. Tripp et al
as 4:2020cv04110
Defendant:
Dan Nelson, Chris Nipe, David Fink and others
Plaintiff:
Jenalyn Matute Cabanag
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FINK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv49620
Plaintiff:
DAVID FINK
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FINK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv43928
Plaintiff:
DAVID FINK
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FINK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv71648
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN DAVID FINK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dominick v. Harris et al
as 4:2017cv04485
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dominick, Jr.
Defendant:
Kamala D. Harris, Shayne M Christman, Luis Fernando Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
