Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ducksworth et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2013cv00099
Plaintiff:
Althea Ducksworth , Robert C. Ducksworth, Jr. , Brian Keith Ducksworth and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Pangborn Corporation, Clark Sand Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Roberts v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2013cv00072
Plaintiff:
Terry T. Roberts
Defendant:
3M Company, Pangborn Corporation, Clark Sand Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Weathersby v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2013cv00074
Plaintiff:
Earnest Weathersby
Defendant:
3M Company, Pangborn Corporation, Clark Sand Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Williams v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2013cv00073
Plaintiff:
Rayford James Williams
Defendant:
3M Company, Pangborn Corporation, Clark Sand Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Davis v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2013cv00076
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lee Davis
Defendant:
3M Company, Pangborn Corporation, Clark Sand Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Fox v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2013cv00075
Plaintiff:
Ava C. Fox
Defendant:
3M Company, Pangborn Corporation, Clark Sand Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Ferguson et al v. Compton Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00319
Plaintiff:
Jacquelin Ferguson , Tammi Raines and Steven John Ferguson
Defendant:
Compton Enterprises, Inc. and Santrol, A Division of Fairmount Minerals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rick R Mahar v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2005cv01657
Plaintiff:
Rick R Mahar
Defendant:
3M Company, Abrasive Blast Equipment Corporation, Aero Company Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
