Cases 1 - 7 of 7
In Re: Nuvaring Products Liability Litigation
as 4:2008md01964
Plaintiff:
DACIA D. DAVIS, JACQUELINE LEMIEUX, XIANNA N.M. PEREZ and others
Defendant:
Merck and Co Inc, Organon Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. LLC, Schering-Plough Corporation and others
Petitioner:
Gregory N McEwen, Shirley Moore, Karen Wilson and others
In Re:
Nuvaring Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KELLY II v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv76059
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY KELLY II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KELLY v. ORGANON USA, INC. et al
as 4:2011cv01247
Plaintiff:
TONYA J. KELLY and Gregory Kelly
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc. , Organon Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. , Organon International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KELLY v. ORGANON USA, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv02440
Plaintiff:
TONYA J. KELLY and GREGORY KELLY
Defendant:
ORGANON USA, INC., ORGANON PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., ORGANON INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moreschi et al v. Limo Source, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00731
Plaintiff:
Angelina Moreschi and Christopher Jadick
Defendant:
Limo Source, Inc., Feng Dong, N&M Taxi Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Marriott International, Inc. and Gregory Kelly
Cross_defendant:
Feng Dong, Limo Source, Inc., N&M Taxi Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelly v. Bradley
as 1:2009cv00282
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kelly
Defendant:
William C. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ORTIZ v. NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES (DYFS) et al
as 2:2007cv04162
Plaintiff:
JUAN CARLOS ORTIZ
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES (DYFS), GREGORY KELLY, CARLITOS RIVERA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
