Cases 1 - 10 of 33
USA v. Daniels
as 23-50423
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Ricky J. Daniels, Jr.
Daniels v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02646
Plaintiff:
Davis J. Daniels
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DANIELS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv40473
Plaintiff:
ARYM J DANIELS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'Connor v. Xpress Cargo, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00797
Plaintiff:
Lauren O'Connor and Lauren C. O'Connor
Defendant:
Xpress Cargo, Inc. and John J. Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DANIELS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv19848
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TEVIN J DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniel v. Wright Medical Technology Inc
as 2:2020cv01897
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology, Inc. and Wright Medical Technology Inc
Plaintiff:
James J. Daniel and James J Daniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Daniels et al
as 6:2020cv00986
Defendant:
Ricky J. Daniels, Jr. and ELPSS Career Institute LLC
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
DANIELS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv54976
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL J DANIELS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DANIEL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv97510
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CRAIG J DANIEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DANIELS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv25053
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TREVOR J DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
