Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Thomas v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv01360
Plaintiff:
James E. Thomas
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
THOMAS v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00435
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2018cv04199
Plaintiff:
James E Thomas
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas, Jr. et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv02789
Plaintiff:
James E. Thomas, Jr. and Deborah Thomas
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALDRICH et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv04864
Plaintiff:
MARIE J. ALDRICH , LEONEL R. ALVAREZ , SARAH ARENSMAN and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc et al
as 6:2012cv02088
Plaintiff:
James E Thomas and Madoniette Thomas
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Eli Lilly & Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aldrich et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv03815
Plaintiff:
Marie J. Aldrich, Leonel R. Alvarez, Sarah Arensman and others
Defendant:
John Does 1 through 3 and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
THOMAS v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv71087
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. THOMAS
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS v. CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv63434
Plaintiff:
JAMES E THOMAS, JAMES E THOMAS, JAMES E THOMAS and others
Defendant:
CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY, GARLOCK, INC., GARLOCK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
