Cases 1 - 8 of 8
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09133
Plaintiff:
KEITH CLARK, SR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chiles et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv01238
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Jerome Chiles, Dennis Joseph Cardoza, Benjamin Franklin Carey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Chiles et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00285
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Jerome Chiles, Dennis Joseph Cardoza, Benjamin Franklin Carey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Frank Chandler v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. USA, et al
as 21-12618
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK CHANDLER, GLENDA TAYLOR, MARINA SPEKTOR and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. USA, MARLENE GOLDENBERG, APOTEX CORP. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AUROBINDO PHARMA USA, INC.
Clark v. Methapharm, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv23779
Defendant:
PAI Holdings, LLC, formerly known as Pharmaceutical Associates, Inc., Chattem, Inc., J B Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv00692
Plaintiff:
George Keith Clark
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Tanner v. Tyson Sales and Distribution Inc et al
as 7:2020cv01349
Defendant:
Tyson Foods Inc, Tyson Sales and Distribution Inc and Brian Keith Clark, Sr
Plaintiff:
Malik Janay Tanner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clark et al v. Dagne et al
as 1:2020cv02750
Plaintiff:
Kandyce Hatchett, Darren Hatchett II and Keith Clark
Defendant:
CR England, Inc, and Birhanu Abebe Dagne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
