Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Heywood v. Menard, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Davis Heywood, Davis Nicalous Heywood and Cindy L. Heywood
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hutt et al v. United States Postal Service
as 4:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Nicole L. Hutt
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2672 pi Federal Tort Claim Act - Personal Injury
Hill et al v. Blackjack Express LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Robert L Hill, Jr, Elizabeth C Hill, Robert L. Hill, Jr and others
Defendant:
Blackjack Express LLC, James R Mabe and James R. Mabe
Interested Party:
West Great Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. Walmart, Inc
as 2:2021cv01026
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc, Walmart, Walmart Supercenter and others
Plaintiff:
Angela L Johnson and Matthew Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hatfield v. Walmart, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00308
Plaintiff:
Sharon L. Hatfield
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Welch v. Mamadou et al
as 4:2021cv00122
Plaintiff:
Jenny L. Welch
Defendant:
Barry Mamadou and US Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grant v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 4:2021cv00060
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
James L Grant and James L. Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pawlik v. Walmart, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00084
Plaintiff:
Sharon L Pawlik and Sharon L. Pawlik
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IsoNova Technologies LLC v. Rettig et al
as 1:2020cv00071
Defendant:
OvaInnovations, LLC and David L Rettig
Plaintiff:
IsoNova Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill et al v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
as 6:2020cv02032
Claimant:
Cedric L Hill and Tracie L Hill
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
