Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Wilson v. Dill et al
as 3:2024cv00902
Plaintiff:
Shannon Wilson
Defendant:
Larry Dill, Jr., LAPO Incorporated, Transport Labor Contract/Leasing Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
George v. Intel Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv01975
Plaintiff:
Larry R. George
Defendant:
Intel Corporation and Skanska USA Building Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Beltran v. FedEx Freight, Inc.
as 3:2021cv01597
Plaintiff:
Jesus Torres Beltran Beltran and Jesus Daniel Torres Beltran
Defendant:
FedEx Freight, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Larry Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Esposito et al v. Adabala et al
as 1:2021cv01578
Plaintiff:
Linda Esposito and John Esposito
Defendant:
Dikshith Ram Adabala, Moe Doe, Larry Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin et al v. Hermiston School District 8R et al
as 2:2018cv02088
Plaintiff:
Dawna Martin and Todd Martin
Defendant:
David Faaeteete, Larry Usher, Dan Emery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin et al v. Hermiston School District 8R et al
as 2:2018cv02086
Plaintiff:
Dawna Martin and Todd Martin
Defendant:
David Faaeteete, Larry Usher, Dan Emery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Black v. Hughes et al
as 3:2017cv00293
Plaintiff:
Larry Dean Black
Defendant:
DDS Pamela Hughes and MD Phillip Kupfer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Fuller v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc.
as 1:2016cv01765
Defendant:
Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc.
Plaintiff:
Larry Fuller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brookes
as 1:2015cv01739
Plaintiff:
Larry D Brookes
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Brooks v. LRY, LLC
as 1:2015cv01740
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Brooks
Defendant:
LRY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
