Cases 1 - 10 of 23
HARPER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13815
Plaintiff:
NASHAYLA M HARPER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HARPER et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv13634
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
JO ANN HARPER and THOMAS M HARPER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARPER et al v. SKY KING FIREWORKS, INC. et al
as 4:2020cv01500
Defendant:
Sky King Fireworks, Inc., Sky King Fireworks Of Tioga LLC, 3d Pyro and others
Plaintiff:
Eric D Harper and Erin M Harper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elliott v. Chesapeake Sheriff Dept. et al
as 3:2020cv00619
Defendant:
Judge Telfeyan, Kelly M. Harper, Kelcie Chandler and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony William Elliott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARPER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv62979
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DONNIE M HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARPER et al v. SKY KING FIREWORKS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv02031
Defendant:
SKY-KING FIREWORKS GROUP, INC., SKY-KING UNLIMITED, INC., SKY-KING FIREWORKS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ERIN M HARPER and ERIC D HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARPER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv07939
Plaintiff:
HILDA M. HARPER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hunt v. Harper
as 3:2017cv00165
Defendant:
Tom M. Harper, II
Plaintiff:
John David Hunt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Harper v. United States of America
as 2:2017cv00068
Plaintiff:
Samuel M. Harper
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
