Cases 1 - 8 of 8
County of Walker v. OptumRx, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv01767
Defendant:
OptumRx Administrative Services, LLC, OptumRx, Inc., Optum, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
County of Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2016cv01458
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy M Smith
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In the Matter of the Complaint of T&T Marine Salvage, Inc.
as 4:2014cv02723
Petitioner:
T&T Marine Salvage, Inc.
Claimant:
Steven M Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Smith v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv03057
Plaintiff:
Sabrina M. Smith
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Head v Smith
as 2:2013cv00029
Plaintiff:
Karen Head
Defendant:
James M Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Smith v. DePuy Inc et al
as 3:2012cv04870
Plaintiff:
Angela M. Smith
Defendant:
DePuy Inc , DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith et al v. Sanders et al
as 3:2012cv04377
Plaintiff:
Lawrence M Smith and United States of America
Defendant:
Deion L Sanders , Damien Lamarc Wallace , Frederick R Mays and others
Consol_defendant:
RonKesha Evett Mays, Herman Murray, T. Christopher Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Rucks et al v. Koppers Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00134
Plaintiff:
Jaborie Rucks, Nicole Shuntae Russell, Mary B. Saldivar and others
Defendant:
Koppers Industries, Inc., Koppers Industries, Inc., Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
