Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Villegas v. Jackrabbit Family Medicine Incorporation et al
as 2:2020cv01540
Defendant:
Unknown Goodrick, GD Searle LLC, Unknown Parties and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Villegas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Peterson v. Burke et al
as 2:2020cv00106
Defendant:
Suzanne Barr, Mario E. Diaz, Marco A Lopez, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newton-Handy v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv04137
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Mario Newton-Handy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanchez v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03029
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Mario Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
De La Rosa v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv04327
Plaintiff:
Mario De La Rosa
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tamez v. Din et al
as 4:2018cv00468
Defendant:
Cochise County Jail, First Baptist Church, Moeen Din and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Tamez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Richard v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv03093
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Mario Richard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tamez v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2018cv00345
Defendant:
Cochise County Sheriff's Department, Arizona, State of, Cochise County Attorney's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Tamez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mangini et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv02295
Plaintiff:
Jean Marie Mangini and Mario Jude Mangini, Sr.
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Salazar v. Flores et al
as 3:2016cv08201
Plaintiff:
Mario Salazar
Defendant:
Arturo Flores , Lily Transportation , Ryder Transportation Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
