Cases 1 - 10 of 21
PENN v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2023cv02693
Plaintiff:
JAMES DEVON PENN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
FLAVELL v. MARSHALL et al
as 1:2021cv01406
Plaintiff:
SARA GONZALEZ FLAVELL
Defendant:
REED GROUP, LTD and TRACY JANE MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AINLEY et al v. WASHBURN
as 1:2020cv03825
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL AINLEY, BILL VAN LOO and ERIN BERTRAM
Defendant:
EDWARD WASHBURN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ACKLEY et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2020cv00621
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL L. BENEWAY, ANDREW K. CROFT, CRAIG J. DICK and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
MARSHALL v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP.
as 1:2019cv03432
Plaintiff:
DENISE MARSHALL
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 2
CHANDLER v. BERLIN et al
as 1:2018cv02136
Defendant:
INVESTIGATIVE CONSULTANTS INCORPORATED, INVESTIGATIVE CONSULTANTS, INC., DONALD MARSHALL BERLIN and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CHANDLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AYERS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2018cv00265
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Plaintiff:
KEVIN AYERS , CARL CRONIN , DWAYNE HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MITCHELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv01699
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , C. EPHRUSSI , AMY MORGAN and others
Plaintiff:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MURPHY v. U.S. MARSHALS
as 1:2016cv01949
Plaintiff:
VALERIE MURPHY
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
BURKS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2016cv01102
Plaintiff:
ALAN BURKS , ALISON BURKS MCRUIZ , SARAH DENMARK DENSON and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and IRANIAN REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
