Cases 1 - 10 of 15
PRINDLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv52454
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY PRINDLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Prindle v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04052
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER PRINDLE
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PRINDLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv84674
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALEC PRINDLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PRINDLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv61304
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALEC PRINDLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PRINDLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv44306
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DEREK PRINDLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Prindle v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02672
Plaintiff:
David Prindle
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PRINDLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv23476
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HARRISON PRINDLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PRINDLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv13091
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MICHAEL PRINDLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Atiles et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11854
Plaintiff:
Joseph Poidomani, Michael Lamorte, Paul Nietman and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Walker et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03409
Defendant:
Kidde-Fenwal, Inc., UTC FIre & Security Americas Corporation, Inc., Kidde PLC, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Flanagan, Mary Martinez, Kelii Apo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
