Cases 1 - 10 of 20
MANK v. EXACTECH INC et al
as 1:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MANK
Defendant:
EXACTECH INC, EXACTECH US INC, TPG INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LARRABEE v. BRAY
as 1:2021cv00205
Plaintiff:
RICHARD L LARRABEE, SR
Defendant:
DANIEL F BRAY
Counter Defendant:
NOR'WESTER F/V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
BAME v. D F RICHARD INC
as 2:2020cv00044
Defendant:
D F RICHARD INC
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE BAME
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITTINGTON v. CITY OF BANGOR HALL
as 1:2019cv00553
Plaintiff:
RICHARD WHITTINGTON
Defendant:
CITY OF BANGOR HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LOPES v. ATRIUM MEDICAL CORPORATION, et al
as 2:2019cv00188
Defendant:
MAQUET CARDIOVASCULAR US SALES LLC, GETINGE AB and ATRIUM MEDICAL CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LOPES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KARAJIN v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC et al
as 2:2018cv00448
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES INC, DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC, DEPUY INTERNATIONAL LIMITED and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KARAJIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRATT et al v. JENSEN, BAIRD, GARDNER & HENRY PA et al
as 2:2017cv00463
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BRATT , COREY SNOW , HEIDI CINADER and others
Defendant:
JENSEN, BAIRD, GARDNER & HENRY PA , LINDA MOULTON, LEE IVY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITTINGTON v. CITY OF BANGOR et al
as 1:2017cv00413
Plaintiff:
RICHARD WHITTINGTON
Defendant:
CITY OF BANGOR and COMMUNITY CONNECTOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LETURE et al v. COCHRANE
as 1:2017cv00310
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LETURE and PATRICIA LETURE
Defendant:
LESLIE COCHRANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MIEKKA v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2016cv00236
Plaintiff:
RICHARD G MIEKKA
Defendant:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Counter_claimant:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Counter_defendant:
RICHARD G MIEKKA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
