Cases 1 - 10 of 113
Brown v. Yarco Property Management et al
as 4:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Robert Anthony Brown
Defendant:
Yarco Property Management and A Aguirre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
OPENED IN ERROR
as 7:2023cv01636
Plaintiff:
Robert Lafayette Brown, III
Defendant:
United States of America
Brown v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01637
Plaintiff:
Robert Lafayette Brown, III
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CARLOS BROWN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv01181
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEO BROWN, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09309
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WAYNE BROWN III and ROBERT WAYNE BROWN, III
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08452
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOHN BROWN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv52982
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E BROWN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv37747
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WILSON BROWN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv25604
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DON BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
