Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Ramirez v. Long Island Railroad Company
as 1:2023cv04408
Plaintiff:
Robert Ramirez
Defendant:
Long Island Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
RAMIREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv58603
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RAMIREZ
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMIREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv78121
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RAMIREZ
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramirez v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv02223
Plaintiff:
Robert Ramirez
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramirez v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv02224
Plaintiff:
Robert Ramirez
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bobbitt et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11886
Plaintiff:
Richard Solomon, Joseph Scattareggia, Kevin Skinner and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Ramirez et al v. Hoover Treated Wood Products, Inc.
as 1:2017cv01545
Plaintiff:
Ofilia Ramirez , Robert Ramirez, Jr. , Patricia Aguirre and others
Defendant:
Hoover Treated Wood Products Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ramirez et al v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2017at00861
Plaintiff:
Ofilia Ramirez, Robert Ramirez, Sr., Patricia Aguirre and others
Defendant:
Robert Ramirez, Jr. and Hoover Treated Wood Products Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Falcone v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv03034
Defendant:
Phillip Alfano, Erik Miller, New York City Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Falcone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Ramirez v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
as 2:2014cv10253
Plaintiff:
Robert Ramirez
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
