Cases 1 - 9 of 9
SCHWEIKERT v. THOMAS EAGLE et al
as 2:2020cv04310
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, THOMAS EAGLE and URS FEDERAL SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
ERIN SCHWEIKERT
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
CANTWELL v. AECOM C&E, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv01325
Defendant:
AECOM CONSULT, INC., AECOM GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC., ABC CORPORATIONS (1-10) and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS CANTWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GORCHOCK v. AECOM C&E, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv01329
Defendant:
AECOM CONSULT, INC., AECOM GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC., ABC CORPORATIONS (1-10) and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GORCHOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BACHNER v. AECOM C&E, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv01324
Defendant:
AECOM CONSULT, INC., AECOM FIELD SERVICES, LLC, ABC CORPORATIONS (1-10) and others
Plaintiff:
KERRI ANN BACHNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GORCHOCK v. AECOM C&E, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv01323
Defendant:
AECOM CONSULT, INC., AECOM FIELD SERVICES, LLC, AECOM INFRASTRUCTURE, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ALISA M. GORCHOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HERRON et al v. RUBLE et al
as 3:2018cv00166
Defendant:
UNITED ROAD SERVICES, INC., MARK W. RUBLE and URS MIDWEST, INC.
Plaintiff:
LUCIAN (JACK) HERRON and ROY HUMBERTSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANDERS et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2012cv60181
Plaintiff:
LANNY SANDERS and SANDRA JENSEN SANDERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY , ADVANCED COMPOSITES GROUP, INC, ALLISON ENGINE COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUNTER et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv06123
Plaintiff:
ETTA MAE HUNTER, ROGER PARKS, JERRY ROBINSON and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HARRIS et al v. URS CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv01673
Plaintiff:
CHERYL A. HARRIS and DOUGLAS MASETH
Defendant:
URS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
