Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Hardy v. Crane Co. et al
as 1:2017cv10826
Defendant:
Crane Co., Carrier Corporation, CBS Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
FMC Corporation and Bayer Cropscience, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Riley Power Inc., A. W. Chesterton Co., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Hardy
Not Classified By Court:
Judge Robert B. Collings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Milward, et al v. Acuity Specialty Products Grou, et al
as 13-2132
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN K. MILWARD and LINDA J. MILWARD
Defendant:
ACUITY SPECIALTY PRODUCTS GROUP, INC., AGS COMPANY, ARISTECH CHEMICAL CORPORATION and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RUST-O-LEUM CORPORATION and SHERWIN WILLIAMS COMPANY
BARTEL et al v. BUCKEYE STEAMSHIP CO et al
as 2:2010cv37915
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
BUCKEYE STEAMSHIP CO, INTERLAKE STEAMSHIP COMPANY , KINSMAN LINES INC. and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
RAYMOND G. SHINSKI, USX CORPORATION, UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
M. H. DETRICK COMPANY , KAISER ALUMINUM AND CHEMICAL CORPORATION , TURNER AND NEWELL and others
Counter_defendant:
US STEEL CORP
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BITTER v. RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv67532
Plaintiff:
DAVID BITTER
Defendant:
RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION, ACANDS, INC., FLINTKOTE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Milward, et al v. Acuity Specialty Products, et al
as 09-2270
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN K. MILWARD and LINDA J. MILWARD
Defendant - Appellee:
ACUITY SPECIALTY PRODUCTS GROUP, INC., AGS COMPANY, ARISTECH CHEMICAL CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
BOSTICK, INC., LA-CO INDUSTRIES, INC./MARKAL, LPS INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Movant:
COUNCIL FOR EDUCATION AND RESEARCH ON TOXICS, NACHMAN BRAUTBAR, DAVID C. CHRISTIANI and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
