Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Bryant v. World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc
as 3:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Mr. Richard Bryant and Richard Bryant
Defendant:
World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jackson v. World Wrestling Entertainment Inc
as 3:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
Marvin Jackson
Defendant:
World Wrestling Entertainment Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jackson v. World Wrestling Entertainment Inc
as 4:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Marvin Jackson
Defendant:
World Wrestling Entertainment Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Parsons v. World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc.
as 8:2021cv01428
Plaintiff:
Jackson Parsons
Defendant:
World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tavel v. Riddle et al
as 1:2020cv06805
Plaintiff:
Samantha Tavel and Candy Cartwright
Defendant:
Gabe Sapolsky, Evolve Wrestling, Inc., Matt Riddle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Fliehr, et al
as 3:2018cv00565
Defendant:
Ashley Elizabeth Fliehr, Richard Morgan Fliehr, Brian Shields and others
Plaintiff:
Riki Paul Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson v. Bullard et al
as 8:2018cv00901
Plaintiff:
Donald Anderson
Defendant:
Thaddeus Michael Bullard, Sr. and World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James v. World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc
as 3:2015cv01305
Plaintiff:
Michelle James
Defendant:
World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frazier v. World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc.
as 3:2015cv01229
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Frazier
Defendant:
World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haynes III v. World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc.
as 3:2015cv01156
Plaintiff:
William Albert Haynes, III
Defendant:
World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
