Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Aaron et al v. The Medical Protective Company Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00261
Defendant:
Medpro Group Inc., The Medical Protective Company Inc., Medical Protective Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Frieda Aaron, James Albers, Katrina Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Aaron et al v. The Medical Protective Company Inc., et al
as 1:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
Frieda Aaron, James Albers, Jimmy Allen and others
Defendant:
Administratrix Ashisha Wallace, The Medical Protective Company Inc., MedPro Group Inc., f/k/a Medical Protective Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Aaron et al v. McCartney et al
as 1:2018cv00173
Plaintiff:
Frieda Aaron , Patricia Adams , Michelle Agee and others
Defendant:
Paul McCartney , Bonezzi Switzer Polito & Hupp Co. L.P.A. , Jason Paskan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Begley v. Windsor Willits Company et al
as 1:2017cv00317
Plaintiff:
Brian Begley
Defendant:
Windsor Surry Company and Windsor Willits Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dover Limited v. T.J. Morrow
as 12-3136
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Dover Limited
Cross-Defendant:
Stephen J. Lovett and Mansell Capital Partners, LLC
Cross-Claimant:
John H. Banzhaf and Delbert D. Reichardt
Defendant:
Alain Assemi, Hartsfield Capital Securities, Inc., Hartsfield Capital Group and others
Defendant - Appellant:
T. J. Morrow and T.J. Morrow PC
Dover Limited v. Assemi et al
as 1:2008cv01337
Plaintiff:
Dover Limited
Defendant:
Alain Assemi, Hartsfield Capital Securities, Inc., Hartsfield Capital Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Bello Persone Inc v. Phoenix Photonix Inc et al
as 5:2007cv00541
Plaintiff:
Bello Persone Inc
Defendant:
Phoenix Photonix Inc, Gary Begley and Institute for Medical Aesthetics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
