Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Go MD USA LLC v. Doe One et al
as 2:2024cv02928
Defendant:
John Does 1-20
Plaintiff:
Mark J Go MD USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Macom et al v. Frausto et al
as 3:2024cv02152
Defendant:
WebBank, Cross River Bank, John Does 1-20 and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Macom and Anthony Emberger
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Jambulingham v. Defendant 1 et al
as 3:2024cv05792
Defendant:
Defendant 2, AMEAD, Defendant 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Hemanthkumar Jambulingham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
NABIL DWEIB SALEM v. DEFENDANT 1 et al
as 2:2024cv07079
Plaintiff:
NABIL DWEIB SALEM
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-20, Anna Asfahany and Defendant 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
MARTINEZ v. DEFENDANT 1 et al
as 4:2024cv02937
Defendant:
Ad-Seg Property Ofr. Martin, Christian, Tim and others
Plaintiff:
James Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Donnaire Faulkner v. Defendant 1 et al
as 2:2024cv06769
Defendant:
DEFENDANT 3, John Does 1-20, YANG HAOYU and others
Plaintiff:
DONNAIRE FAULKNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Ahmed v. Defendant 1 et al
as 1:2024cv06814
Plaintiff:
Imdad Ahmed
Defendant:
Evangeline Brown, John Does 1-20 and Defendant 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Song v. Defendant 1 et al
as 6:2024cv00809
Plaintiff:
Maoying Song
Defendant:
Defendant 1 AKA Thomas Johnson, JOHN DOES 1- 20, Defendant 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
TAN v. DEFENDANT 1 et al
as 3:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
JONAH TAN
Defendant:
DEFENDANT 1 AKA "Agatha Li", JOHN DOES 1-20, DEFENDANT 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Fitzgerald v. Doe, et al
as 2:2024cv00934
Defendant:
Defendant 1, John Does 1-20 and Lisa
Plaintiff:
George Edward Fitzgerald, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
