Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Strano v. The Proctor & Gamble Company
as 1:2024cv03195
Plaintiff:
Rene Strano and The Proctor & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Pellegrino v. The Procter & Gamble Co.
as 7:2023cv10631
Plaintiff:
Regina Pellegrino
Defendant:
The Proctor & Gamble Company and The Procter & Gamble Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Jennifer Baughman v. Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv07737
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Baughman
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Kenvue Inc, Proctor & Gamble and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Asencio v. Proctor & Gamble Company
as 2:2022cv02017
Plaintiff:
Nicole Asencio
Defendant:
Proctor & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Clayton v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 2:2022cv01996
Plaintiff:
Sheri Clayton
Defendant:
The Proctor & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Aviles et al v. Proctor & Gamble Company
as 2:2022cv01950
Plaintiff:
Eileen Aviles, Shelby Cooper, Tanya Cooper and others
Defendant:
Proctor & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Watson v. THE PROCTOR & GAMBLE COMPANY et al
as 4:2022cv40010
Plaintiff:
Thomas Watson
Defendant:
THE PROCTOR & GAMBLE COMPANY and The Gillette Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Asencio v. Proctor & Gamble Company
as 1:2021cv11212
Plaintiff:
Nicole Asencio
Defendant:
The Proctor & Gamble Company and Proctor & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Clayton v. The Proctor & Gamble Company
as 1:2021cv24425
Plaintiff:
Sheri Clayton
Defendant:
The Proctor & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clayton v. The Proctor & Gamble Co.
as 1:2021cv24426
Plaintiff:
Sheri Clayton
Defendant:
The Proctor & Gamble Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
