Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Mathis et al v. Rutherford et al
as 5:2023cv00917
Plaintiff:
Larry Don Mathis and Bill James Mathis
Defendant:
James Morgan Rutherford, Sr and James Morgan Rutherford, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Wilson v. Long et al
as 2:2023cv00599
Plaintiff:
Chris Wilson
Defendant:
Kevin Long, Millcreek Commercial Properties, LLC, Colliers International and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Twaite v. Rutherford
as 1:2023cv01992
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Theodore Twaite
Defendant:
Kelly Ann Rutherford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fr Fed. Question: Fraud
Stephon Pemmie et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05001
Plaintiff:
Stephon Pemmie, Byron Pena, Megan Peppers and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Pemmie et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00807
Plaintiff:
Stephon Pemmie, Byron Pena, Megan Peppers and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Devabhaktuni v. Godbey et al
as 3:2019cv03039
Defendant:
Dasha Barton, Rebecca Rutherford and David C Godbey
Plaintiff:
Manogna Devabhaktuni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Devabhaktuni v. Rutherford et al
as 3:2019cv03011
Plaintiff:
Manogna Devabhaktuni
Defendant:
Rebecca Rutherford, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas and David C Godbey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Devabhaktuni v. Rutherford et al
as 3:2019cv02987
Defendant:
Rebecca Rutherford, Renee Toliver, David C Godbey and others
Plaintiff:
Manogna Devabhaktuni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Devabhaktuni v. Rutherford
as 3:2019cv02983
Plaintiff:
Manogna Devabhaktuni
Defendant:
Rebecca Rutherford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Devabhaktuni v. Rutherford et al
as 3:2019cv02965
Plaintiff:
Manogna Devabhaktuni
Defendant:
Rebecca Rutherford and Fiona Iam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
