Torts - Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Sklair v. Mike Bloomberg 2020, Inc.
as 22-864
Plaintiff / Appellant: Alexis Sklair, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Sterling Rettke, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Nathaniel Brown, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: Mike Bloomberg 2020, Inc. and Michael R. Bloomberg
Jessie Smith, III, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 15-30742
Plaintiff - Appellant: JESSIE SMITH, III, individually & on behalf of J.A. Smith and JASMINE MARIE SMITH, individually & on behalf of J.A. Smith
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, Earl H. Stockdale, Chief Counsel, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, Loretta Lynch, Attorney General, DENISE FREDERICK, Chief Counsel, US Army Corps of Engineers and others
Jessie Smith, III v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
as 15-30742
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jessie Smith, III, individually & on behalf of J.A. Smith and Jasmine Marie Smith, individually & on behalf of J.A. Smith
Defendant / Appellee: United States Army Corps of Engineers, Earl H. Stockdale, Chief Counsel, United States Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, Attorney General, Denise Frederick, Chief Counsel, US Army Corps of Engineers and others
Federal Trade Commission v. Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al
as 14-13972
Plaintiff - Appellee: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellant: HI-TECH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., corporations, JARED WHEAT, individually and as officers of the corporation and STEPHEN SMITH, individually and as officers of National Urological Group, Inc., and national Institute for Clinical Weight Loss, Inc.
Federal Trade Commission v. Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-13131
Plaintiff - Appellee: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellant: HI-TECH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Corporations, JARED WHEAT, individually and as officers of the corportation, STEPHEN SMITH, individually and as officers of National Urological Group, Inc., and National Institute for Clinical Weight Loss, Inc. and others
Arthur Merkin, et al v. Vonage America, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-55397
Plaintiff - Appellee: ARTHUR MERKIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public and JAMES SMITH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public
Defendant - Appellant: VONAGE AMERICA, INC.
Bruce Eisen, et al v. Porsche Cars North America, In
as 14-55304
Plaintiff - Appellee: BRUCE EISEN, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, KYMMBERLI R. UREDA, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, LEE SMITH, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals and others
Objector - Appellant: JILL WEITZNER
Defendant - Appellee: PORSCHE CARS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Rosita Smith v. Legal Helpers Debt Resolution, et al
as 11-35974
Plaintiff - Appellee: ROSITA H SMITH, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated Washington State Residents
Defendant: LEGAL HELPERS DEBT RESOLUTION LLC, a Nevada limited liability company and JEM GROUP INC, a Nevada corporation
Defendant - Appellant: MARSHALL BANKS LLC, a California company
Rosita Smith v. Legal Helpers Debt Resolution, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-35964
Plaintiff - Appellee: ROSITA H SMITH, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated Washington State Residents
Defendant - Appellant: LEGAL HELPERS DEBT RESOLUTION LLC, a Nevada limited liability company and JEM GROUP INC, a Nevada corporation
Mayhew v. Cherry Creek Mortgage Co., Inc, et al
as 10-1148
Plaintiff - Appellant: DOUGLAS MAYHEW
Defendant - Appellee: CHERRY CREEK MORTGAGE CO., INC., a Colorado corporation, NORA ZIEL, MIKE SMITH, individually and in his official capacity and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?