Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Marywood University v. Synergi Partners, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00991
Plaintiff:
Marywood University
Defendant:
Synergi Partners, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Wieger v. MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01713
Plaintiff:
Gina Wieger
Defendant:
MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, LLC, MEAD JOHNSON NUTRITION COMPANY, ABBOTT LABORATORIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PETROLEUM MARKETING GROUP, INC. v. UNIVERSAL PROPERTY SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04711
Plaintiff:
PETROLEUM MARKETING GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
UNIVERSAL PROPERTY SERVICES, INC., MR3 LOGISTICS, LLC, ORBIT FREIGHT LINES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MUSITIEF v. PENN MEDICINE UNIVERSITY CITY et al
as 2:2021cv04456
Plaintiff:
SANNA MUSITIEF
Defendant:
PENN MEDICINE UNIVERSITY CITY, PENN MEDICINE and TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
BIDDLE v. THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 2:2021cv00815
Defendant:
NEC NETWORKS, LLC doing business as CAPTURERX, CHARLES J. HILTON and THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER
Plaintiff:
MARK BIDDLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOSKIE v. DREXEL UNIVERSITY
as 2:2021cv00592
Plaintiff:
JOHN EDWARD BOSKIE, JR.
Defendant:
DREXEL UNIVERSITY doing business as DREXEL MEDICINE
SMITH v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY
as 2:2018cv00590
Plaintiff:
KYLE SMITH
Defendant:
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GARCIA v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2017cv05324
Plaintiff:
HAMLET GARCIA, JR.
Defendant:
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY, CATALDI BROOKE and KEVIN MYLINSKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dicent v. Kaplan University
as 3:2017cv01488
Plaintiff:
MariaJacqueline Dicent
Defendant:
Kaplan University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEFF et al v. UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME DU LAC
as 2:2016cv00798
Plaintiff:
SCOTT B. LEFF and MARILYN J. MCDANIEL
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME DU LAC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
