Cases 1 - 10 of 110
Simpson v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 1:2023cv16465
Plaintiff:
Bridget Simpson
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., Sumter Easy Home LLC and Ningbo (USA) Home-Link Plastic Product Mfg., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Williams v. Simpson
as 1:2023cv01418
Plaintiff:
Stephen Williams
Defendant:
Dewey Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Krueger v. Nebraska et al
as 4:2023cv04081
Plaintiff:
Tommy Eugene Krueger
Defendant:
Nebraska, Connie Krueger, Kerri Krueger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Bartolotti v. Simpson Imports, Ltd.
as 1:2023cv03900
Plaintiff:
Louis Bartolotti
Defendant:
Simpson Imports, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Valiente v. Simpson Imports LTD
as 3:2023cv02214
Plaintiff:
Andrea Valiente
Defendant:
Simpson Imports LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Anete Rosario et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05035
Plaintiff:
Anete Rosario, Deanna Rose, Robin Ross and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Stephon Pemmie et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05001
Plaintiff:
Stephon Pemmie, Byron Pena, Megan Peppers and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Pemmie et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00807
Plaintiff:
Stephon Pemmie, Byron Pena, Megan Peppers and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Rosario et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00821
Plaintiff:
Anete Rosario, Deanna Rose, Robin Ross and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Williams v. Simpson et al
as 1:2022cv00208
Plaintiff:
Stuart A. Williams
Defendant:
Rhonda M. Simpson and Concrete Developments LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
