Cases 1 - 10 of 622
PIERCE et al v. KLOVER HOLDINGS, INC.
as 2:2024cv00665
Plaintiff:
NATALIE PIERCE and MICHELLE INGRODI
Defendant:
KLOVER HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
DAVID et al v. AMAZON.COM INC. et al
as 3:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
CAROL DAVID, HAROLD DAVID and CENTRE COUNTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, P OF H
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM INC. and AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
DAVID et al v. AMAZON.COM INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
CAROL DAVID, HAROLD DAVID and CENTRE COUNTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, P OF H
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM INC. and AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
KOSSMAN et al v. BEEMSTERBOER
as 2:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
CURTIS KOSSMAN and MODERN WALL SYSTEMS, L.P. doing business as MODERN WALL SYSTEMS
Defendant:
BEAU BEEMSTERBOER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (USPS)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
REMUS v. FOX
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN R. REMUS
Defendant:
AARON D. FOX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
HAINES et al v. THE HOME DEPOT, INC.
as 2:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Donna Lee Haines and Neil Paul Haines
Defendant:
THE HOME DEPOT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Non-Motor Vehicle
ZHANG v. DORRANCE PUBLISHING CO. et al
as 2:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
JEFF BAOLIANG ZHANG
Defendant:
DORRANCE PUBLISHING CO., MICHAEL KNAPP and VICKIE KOWALECKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
BOBACK v. GEISLER et al
as 2:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BOBACK
Defendant:
MICHAEL S. GEISLER, ESQ., MICHAEL A. DORUNDO and CYNTHIA M. DORUNDO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
