Cases 91 - 100 of 157
Simon v. Anoka County Social Services et al
as 0:2012cv02754
Plaintiff:
Janice E. Simon
Defendant:
Anoka County Social Services and Lisa Gray
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv02422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peet v. Edina Realty, Inc. et al
as 0:2012cv01997
Plaintiff:
John E Peet
Defendant:
Edina Realty, Inc., Vivienne May, Shannon Glen's apt's "manger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Mitchell et al
as 0:2012cv01751
Plaintiff:
Shepard Johnson
Defendant:
Chester Mitchell, Catherine Mitchell, Julie Anne Kahler and others
Trustee:
J. Russell Cunningham
Intervenor_plaintiff:
J. Michael Hopper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Minnesota Voters Alliance et al v. Ritchie et al
as 0:2012cv00519
Plaintiff:
Minnesota Voters Alliance , Minnesota Freedom Council , Sondra Erickson and others
Defendant:
Mark Ritchie , Lori Swanson , Joe Mansky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Bagge v. Ellison
as 0:2012cv00432
Plaintiff:
Bradley E. Bagge
Defendant:
Keith Ellison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv00212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Booker v. Saint Paul, City of The
as 0:2012cv00203
Plaintiff:
Gerald E. Booker
Defendant:
Saint Paul, City of The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. Murnane Brandt et al
as 0:2012cv00122
Plaintiff:
Berry A. Willis
Defendant:
Murnane Brandt, Bayview Management Corporation, Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. Tom Roy, et al.
as 0:2011cv03738
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson
Defendant:
Minnesota, State of, Lori Swanson, Lori Skjerven Gildea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
