Cases 91 - 100 of 576
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
v. City of Pomona et al
as 2:2023cv01014
Defendant:
City of Pomona, Michael Ellis Police Chief, Garret M Dulong Pomona Police Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Serrano III et al v. Michael Ellis et al
as 2:2023cv01016
Plaintiff:
Robert Serrano III, Amado F. Suarez and Jose Luis Juarez
Defendant:
City of Pomona, Michael Ellis Police Chief, Garret M. Dulong Pomona Police Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Cody v. Ring LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00562
Plaintiff:
Annette Cody
Defendant:
Ring LLC and Does 1 through 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Annette Cody v. Lacoste USA, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Annette Cody
Defendant:
Lacoste USA, Inc., DOES 1 through 25, and Does 1 through 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Miguel Licea v. Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Miguel Licea
Defendant:
Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55113
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
A. Chaudry v. County of San Diego, et al
as 23-55034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
A. WAHEED CHAUDRY
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, TODD MCCRACKEN, LUZETTE WARNER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
