Civil Rights Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 91 - 100 of 115
WHESTONE v. GRAHAM
as 2:2011cv04123
Plaintiff: EDWIN WHESTONE
Defendant: GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rearick v. Spanier et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2011cv00624
Plaintiff: Deborah Rearick
Defendant: Graham Spanier , Susan J. Wiedemer , Al Horvath and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01193
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
GRAHAM et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv00859
Plaintiff: ZACHARIAH GRAHAM and BEVERLY GRAHAM
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Voneida v. Stoehr et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv02572
Plaintiff: Kenneth L. Voneida
Defendant: Kevin Stoehr, Graham Spanier, Gregory Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01125
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. PORT AUTHORITY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2010cv01101
Plaintiff: MITCHELL GRAHAM
Defendant: PORT AUTHORITY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PORT AUTHORITY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY TRANSIT POLICE, R. MEDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02778
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HOOD v. CARROLL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00560
Plaintiff: DAVID J. HOOD
Defendant: JOSEPH W. CARROLL, DARCIE GATTI, JUSTIN STEPHENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00364
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?