Cases 101 - 110 of 920
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bassi et al v. Mount Airy, No. 1. LLC
as 3:2023cv00550
Plaintiff:
Surjeet Bassi, Jaswinder Chilana, Tajinder Singh and others
Defendant:
Mount Airy, No. 1. LLC d/b/a Mount Airy Casino Resort
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Seamon v. Shapiro et al
as 1:2023cv00543
Defendant:
The Penn Millers Insurance Company, Margaret McLaine, Governor Josh Shapiro and others
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Seamon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Seamon v. Shapiro et al
as 3:2023cv00543
Defendant:
The Penn Millers Insurance Company, Margaret McLaine, Governor Josh Shapiro and others
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Seamon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Rahman v. Hughes
as 3:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Farida B. Rahman
Defendant:
Richard M. Hughes, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dwumaah v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv00452
Plaintiff:
Kwame Dwumaah
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas and Tony Bryson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ROBERTS et al v. MANHEIM BOROUGH et al
as 2:2023cv00832
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ROBERTS, KIM ZAPATA doing business as KIM ZAPATA D/B/A KIM'S CARS and MS. KIM ZAPATA
Defendant:
MANHEIM BOROUGH, DONNA CZEINER, ADRIN VARGAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
