Cases 101 - 110 of 138
Burke v. City of Prattville, Alabama et al
as 2:2012cv01017
Plaintiff:
Ken Burke
Defendant:
City of Prattville, Alabama, Bill Gillespie, Terry Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv03894
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Lambert v. District Court of Houston County et al(MAG+)
as 1:2012cv00912
Plaintiff:
Travis Lee Lambert
Defendant:
Circuit Court of Houston County Alabama, Brady E. Mendheim, Jr., Douglas A. Valeska and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
George v. County of Jefferson et al
as 2:2010cv03389
Plaintiff:
Bill George
Defendant:
County of Jefferson, City of Hueytown, Mike Hale and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program v. Pafenbach et al
as 1:2010cv00150
Plaintiff:
Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program
Defendant:
John Pafenbach, Glenn L. Hodge, Michelle Herman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Palmgren v. Homewood, City of et al
as 2:2009cv01320
Plaintiff:
Dane Palmgren
Defendant:
Homewood, City of, Homewood, City of, Phillip Dodd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
