Cases 111 - 120 of 705
ROLON v. ROE et al
as 2:2021cv04779
Plaintiff:
JOSE ROLON
Defendant:
RICHARD ROE, JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KENNEDY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2021cv04667
Plaintiff:
EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THOMAS W. WOLF, JOSUA D. SHAPIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lundy v. Lenning et al
as 3:2021cv01767
Plaintiff:
Steven Love Lundy and Steven Love Lundy Trust
Defendant:
Kenneth Lenning, Matthew Nero, E. David Chtristine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Stash et al
as 3:2021cv01787
Plaintiff:
Wayne Harris
Defendant:
Sergeant Stash, Officer Gatrell, Public Defender John Donavon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
LILLEY v. PA SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 1:2021cv00282
Plaintiff:
JOHN R LILLEY, JR.
Defendant:
PA SUPERIOR COURT, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, WESTERN DISTRICT CRIMINAL DIVISION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
EYAJAN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2021cv00267
Plaintiff:
SHEILA MARIE EYAJAN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LINZE III v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 1:2021cv00233
Plaintiff:
EDWARD L. LINZ III
Defendant:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SOMERSET COUNTY COURTHOUSE et al v. BEY
as 2:2021cv03751
Defendant:
ERICK JAVIER SANTOS BEY and ERICK ANTHONY SANTOS
Plaintiff:
SOMERSET COUNTY COURTHOUSE, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, MAGISTRATE JUDGE SCOTT BITTNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
