Civil Rights Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 111 - 120 of 308
DRAYTON v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2015cv02114
Plaintiff: DEWITT DRAYTON
Defendant: LOUIS GIORLA, MATTHEWS, SERRANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02113
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
WILLIAMS v. STOFFLET et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv01642
Plaintiff: ROBERTA WILLIAMS
Defendant: MATTHEW STOFFLET , WEST POTTSGROVE TOWNSHIP , GARY QUINONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROSSMAN v. MULLEN et al
as 2:2015cv01614
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER BROSSMAN
Defendant: JOSEPH MULLEN , BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY , THE BUCKS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. WALKER et al
as 2:2015cv01330
Plaintiff: DAVID TAYLOR
Defendant: JEFFREY WALKER, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CHARLES RAMSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reviello v. Midland Funding, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00496
Plaintiff: Gerald Reviello
Defendant: Midland Funding, LLC , John Does 1-10 and Corporations X, Y, Z
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WHITEHEAD v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv00701
Plaintiff: AMIN WHITEHEAD
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PERRY BETTS and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERRY v. KABACINSKI et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00169
Plaintiff: Steven Berry
Defendant: Matthew Kabacinski and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUIZ v. BRADLEY et al
as 5:2015cv00049
Plaintiff: DAMIAN RUIZ
Defendant: BEN BRADLEY , JONATHAN REPPERT , HICKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERSON v. OPRENDEK et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00317
Plaintiff: DANIEL F. PETERSON
Defendant: ANTHONY C. OPRENDEK, BENJAMIN E. ZIMMER, JANE DOE 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?