Cases 111 - 120 of 18,765
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01430
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CROSS v. WYSONG et al
as 1:2024cv01423
Defendant:
ILEF, FLORENCE and JASON WYSONG
Plaintiff:
CHARLES CROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tabernacle Church Joint Board et al v. Morgan et al
as 2:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Ezell Foster, Tabernacle Church Joint Board, Antonio R Daggett Sr. and others
Defendant:
Takenya Julkes, Roy L Davis, Princella Askew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
CASSEL v. GIVENS et al
as 2:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE CASSEL
Defendant:
CARL WASSBERG and HUNTER GIVENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00060
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DHANI v. HAMILTON COUNTY DRAINAGE BOARD et al
as 1:2024cv01405
Defendant:
MARK E HEIRBRANDT, STEVEN C. DILLINGER, KENTON C. WARD and others
Plaintiff:
HARVINDER SINGH DHANI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01403
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
