Cases 121 - 130 of 133
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BAUGH v. PARKS et al
as 1:2008cv00833
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW A. BAUGH
Defendant:
KARLENE PARKS, JOHN DOE, SHERRY MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
TURNER v. LAMAR et al
as 1:2008cv00063
Plaintiff:
CLAYTON TURNER and CLAYTON TURNER
Defendant:
OFFICER __________ LAMAR and STATE OF INDIANA/INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION (PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
LEACH v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2007cv01376
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL LEACH
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, STATE OF INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, THE GEO GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
PATTERSON et al v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2007cv01318
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PATTERSON and R. P.
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, SCOTT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RESIG v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2007cv00688
Plaintiff:
JAN RESIG
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
