Cases 131 - 140 of 459
MCOSKER v. BOROUGH OF CHESILHURST et al
as 1:2019cv16120
Plaintiff:
DANIEL MCOSKER
Defendant:
TIMOTHY MIMS, BOROUGH OF CHESILHURST and JEFFREY GAUNTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRYANT v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2019cv17592
Defendant:
P.O. JOANNA LOPEZ, JOHN DOE POLICE, SGT. RICHARD FLOUNOY, SR. and others
Plaintiff:
RAHEEM L BRYANT and RAHEEM BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2019cv17591
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK, ESSEX COUNTY JAIL, SGT. ILIDIO FEREIRA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANTONELLI v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2019cv16962
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY, JESSICA LAINE, WALTER NORRIS and others
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE LYN ANTONELLI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv13985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BATISTA et al v. BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD et al
as 2:2019cv14741
Defendant:
DANIEL BERGER, THOMAS J. GALLAGHER, BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD and others
Plaintiff:
ARELIS BATISTA and CARLOS MORA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCLEOD v. FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT et al
as 3:2019cv12893
Defendant:
DONALD MACERJKA, JENNIFER SATLER, MARGARET PRESCOTT and others
Plaintiff:
STEVE MCLEOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA v. EVERETT
as 3:2019cv12541
Defendant:
DANIEL EVERETT
Plaintiff:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv12321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON v. CITY OF ENGLEWOOD et al
as 2:2019cv06509
Defendant:
DANIELLE CHAPPELLEE, ENGLEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT AND CITY OF ENGLEWOOD JOHN/JANE DOES MANAGERS, SUPERVISORS, EMPLOYEES, CITY OF ENGLEWOOD and others
Plaintiff:
TOD WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
